Dynastic succession is one of the fundamental difficulties in political parties. Since Jawaharlal Nehru became the first prime minister of independent India, the Congress Party has faced the difficulty of dynastic succession. Nehru gave away to Indira Gandhi, Rajiv Gandhi gave away to Indira Gandhi, and now Rahul Gandhi has taken over.

'The Emergency' was 21 months imposed by Mrs. Indira Gandhi, India's then-prime minister, from 1975 to 1977. It is often called the 'darkest period of independent India.' It was the most severe challenge to India's democracy. As a result, corruption, criminalization, and the destruction of institutions are still visible in India. She fostered the cynical misapplication of religion.

Riots in 1984, The Congress leaders should have fought to keep the peace. Still, they utilized the widespread outrage over Indira Gandhi's killing to launch a sectarian conflict in Independent India. Even today, Punjab is drowning in the miseries of terrorism.

Even today, Congress refers to itself as a secular party. The rejection or exclusion of religion and religious concern is known as secularism. Being pro-Muslim and anti-Hindu does not constitute secularism. Being anti-Muslim and pro-Hindu is also not secularism. This is referred to as 'sickularism,' not 'secularism.' The Congress has been losing its image and does not have a singular ideal for the country's growth, in contrast to the governing BJP, which does. Its primary goal was to develop India and improve its living standards.

It's not so much the plundering of riches as the reality that Congress basically replaced the Brits in specific ways. For example, they became masters of the same broken, weak individuals eager to suck up power. Nobody had faith in India! This aspect irritates me the most, particularly given MK Gandhi's technique of 'winning' us independence by providing the adversary moral superiority.

Of course, I am aware of the notion of not fighting because one is powerful. But this results from expertise, not shamelessly bowing to superiors! As a result, India has become an apologetic, powerless country, where our youngsters are taught to worship unrealistic, timid, cowardly concepts like nonviolence, even though everything in nature tells us that we must fight to exist.

As a result, we saw a change of guard. The British Left and the Congress Party took their place. Hierarchies, class structure, and subservience all persisted. What happened to all the vigor?

Then we were thrust into a socialist mentality, with people expecting handouts from government wealth redistribution programs rather than being empowered. We received protectionist policies that stifled growth and competitiveness, steering us away from a meritocracy route. Hindustan Motors and Tata Steel were founded at about the same time as Toyota and Nippon Steel. Without local ore deposits, Tata Steel produces almost five times as much as Nippon Steel. There is no need to bring up Hindustan Motors or Toyota. Is it necessary to compare how distinct these two countries' economic trajectories have been? In the aftermath of two nuclear attacks, Japan was much more devastated than India during British rule.

Only after hundreds of people perished did we begin the Green Revolution. We realized we needed to beef up our military when China struck. India liberalized its economy only when we were forced to. Every step we've taken toward advancement has been under unavoidable conditions, with our backs against the wall.

India was never permitted to be genuinely independent, powerful, and proud of the full potential of its people. It's no surprise that many of us emigrated and succeeded in other nations. This is the lot I'd feel the most violated about: depriving India of her most extraordinary skills and brains because we didn't provide the conditions for dignified growth.

Surprisingly, the enormous sacrifices of our combat heroes were also washed away in the flood of Gandhiji devotion. For five years after our independence, the Congress party reported to British Intelligence about Subhash Bose's family's movements. During a criminal investigation into the Bofors affair, the Congress External Affairs Minister wrote to a foreign entity requesting proof and assistance from an Indian investigative agency. Years later, a slew of Congress MPs and their associates used the Indian Parliament's letterhead to ask the US not to grant a visa to Narendra Modi, the man who would become Prime Minister. Why make the British feel better? 

Congress is obsessed with white people and feels compelled to continuously appease them. When Hillary Clinton pushed India to wean itself off Iranian oil, the Indian Congress government quickly agreed, even though Iran and India had long been close partners. It's no wonder, therefore, that an Italian spaghetti aunty reigns supreme. Would she have received the same esteem if she had been a Nigerian black woman? No, I don't believe so. That is how deeply embedded the slave mindset is in the ranks of the United States Congress.

The looting of India's pride, dignity, dynamism, and die-hard spirit disturb me much more than the looting of cash. This nation generated enough money to sustain the British Empire for the next 200 years. It is readily capable of producing much more to secure the wealth, health, and well-being of its own people. This is a wealthy, strong country that has been stopped from becoming a developed, forward-thinking, magnificent nation that might have served as an example to the rest of the world by now.

Looting the nation's riches is unquestionably wrong, but what Congress did was crush our self-esteem. In the 40 years since 1947, the nation's gold has had to be pawned for a few million dollars. You'd be embarrassed if your father went to a local moneylender and pawned your mother's jewelry.

Almost every country, including Pakistan, was performing better than us at the time. PV Narasimha Rao and Dr. MMS deserve a lot of praise. Would they have done it if the IMF hadn't pushed them to lend dollars against gold? Would PVN Rao become Prime Minister? And then watch how they treat him afterward!

Let us now discuss security. It was a pity to lose in 1962. According to all accounts, 1965 was a deadlock. Again, from 2008 to 2014, we did not adequately oppose Pakistani and Chinese invasions in Congress. Because of our lack of self-esteem and confidence, we have always seemed too vulnerable to any attacker.

I'm curious why Gandhi returned to India in 1920. Following World War I, the British were at their weakest. A possible liberation was postponed by 30 years. During this period, Gandhi and Nehru seized control of Congress. 4.3 million countrymen perished from famine due to Churchill's schemes, while Gandhi and Nehru backed the British with almost 100,000 corpses to preserve Britain! Churchill was no different from Hitler, who exterminated six million Jews. Why didn't Gandhi or Nehru speak out against this tyranny? Any ideas? TheIndependence warriors were imprisoned everywhere, from Andaman to death. It was the Aga Khan Palace for Gandhi and Nehru!

Following Gandhi's killing, Nehru utilized malicious propaganda to silence any political opposition. Patriots like Savarkar were imprisoned indefinitely. Subhash Chandra Bose's family has been under observation for decades!

After dealing with the political opposition, he turned his attention to the second power center, big business. Raj essentially controlled them via his license. He provided a playground with no competition for sops. As a result, the politicians were pleased. They became influential and affluent as a result of the licensed Raj. The businessmen were overjoyed. They could sell crappy goods for huge revenues. Keep in mind, Hamara Bajaj. The shoddy scooter, for which one had to pay a premium. Or how about a plain landline phone with a 7-year wait list until 1990? Corruption is built into the system with a growing population and strained supply lines! A government position has become the most desirable occupation.

Concerns about food security We have been living as an agricultural nation on mediocre American food subsidies since 1947. Nehru was not embarrassed, and neither were his supporters.

The story goes on. The list ranges from Bofors to National Herald. Congress has no sense of shame. However, they assured us that the nation had no self-respect. Because it is always easier to abuse a person who is no longer alive in the spirit.

Also Read: Faith Fuelled Rage Or Organised Crime