The Mughal Empire is often considered one of the most significant and powerful empires in Indian history. The Mughals ruled over India for more than three centuries, and their legacy is still felt in the country today. However, the way that the Mughals are portrayed in Indian history textbooks has become a point of controversy and debate. Many argue that the way that the Mughals are depicted in Indian history is a curse to the country, as it perpetuates a narrative of division and intolerance.

I personally felt one of the criticisms in the way that the Mughals are portrayed in Indian history is that it focuses too much on their religious identity. The Mughals were Muslim rulers who came to India from Central Asia, and their rule over a predominantly Hindu population has often been seen as a source of tension and conflict. Indian history textbooks often focus on this tension and depict the Mughals as religious fanatics who were intolerant of other religions.

This portrayal of the Mughals as religious fanatics has been criticized for perpetuating a narrative of division and intolerance in India. It reinforces the idea that India is a country of Hindus and Muslims who are inherently opposed to each other. This narrative has been used by politicians to stoke religious tensions in India, leading to violent conflicts and discrimination against religious minorities.

Another criticism was that the Mughals are portrayed in Indian history is that it overlooks their contributions to Indian society and culture. The Mughals were great patrons of the arts, and they made significant contributions to architecture, literature, and music. Their reign saw the emergence of great poets and writers such as Mirza Ghalib and Abdul Rahim Khan-i-Khana, and the construction of iconic buildings such as the Taj Mahal and the Red Fort.

However, Indian history textbooks often overlook these contributions and focus instead on the perceived negative aspects of Mughal rule. This overlooks the rich cultural legacy of the Mughals and perpetuates the idea that they were foreign invaders who had nothing to offer Indian society.

Perhaps the most significant criticism of the way that the Mughals are portrayed in Indian history is that it overlooks the complex and nuanced nature of their rule. The Mughals were not monolithic, and their reign saw significant variations in policy and governance. Some Mughal emperors, such as Akbar the Great, were known for their tolerance and religious pluralism. Others, such as Aurangzeb, were more intolerant and imposed their religious views on the population.

Indian history textbooks often present the Mughals as a single, unified entity that was defined by its religious identity. This ignores the diversity and complexity of Mughal rule and perpetuates a simplistic narrative of good versus evil.

The way that the Mughals are portrayed in Indian history textbooks has been criticized for perpetuating a narrative of division and intolerance in India. It overlooks the rich cultural legacy of the Mughals and perpetuates a simplistic narrative of good versus evil. Furthermore, it overlooks the complex and nuanced nature of Mughal rule and perpetuates a simplistic narrative of good versus evil.

However, it is important to note that this is not the only narrative about the Mughals that exists in India. Many historians and scholars have sought to offer a more nuanced and balanced view of Mughal rule. They argue that the Mughals made significant contributions to Indian society and culture, and that their legacy is one of richness and diversity.

Aurangzeb is one of the most controversial figures in Indian history. He is often portrayed as a tyrant who imposed his will on the people of India through brute force and religious persecution. His reign is frequently used as a cautionary tale against authoritarianism and religious extremism. However, the fact that he is still prominently featured in Indian history textbooks has sparked controversy and debate.

Many Indians argue that Aurangzeb's inclusion in history textbooks is a curse on the country. They point to his legacy of intolerance and violence, arguing that he was responsible for the persecution of non-Muslims and the destruction of many Hindu temples. They also argue that his policies led to the decline of the Mughal Empire and contributed to the country's subjugation under British rule.

Indians put a curse on Aurangzeb and his reign is often seen as the beginning of the end for the Mughal Empire. His policies of centralization and religious exclusivism weakened the empire and paved the way for its eventual collapse. This, in turn, allowed the British to gain a foothold in India and eventually colonize the country.

In recent years, there has been a push to remove Aurangzeb from Indian history textbooks altogether. Some argue that his legacy is too divisive and that his inclusion only serves to inflame tensions between Hindus and Muslims. Others argue that there are more important figures in Indian history that deserve greater attention and recognition.

In conclusion, Aurangzeb's inclusion in Indian history textbooks is a contentious issue that has sparked much debate and controversy. While some argue that his reign is an important part of the country's history, others view him as a curse and a symbol of intolerance and religious extremism.

And I believe there should be a change of syllabus in the Indian history textbooks and remove all the flaws which mughals put on hindu's.