It is clear from the incident of the Galvan Valley in Ladakh that China is not going to give up its current position unless it pays a big price for its expansionist agenda. China encroached in those areas of Ladakh which are considered very important from the point of view of India's security.

In fact, Chinese President Xi Jinping is aggressively raising his mind when the world is suffering from the biggest disaster of this period in the form of a pandemic caused by the coronavirus originating from China. 

Xi's intentions were clearly evident in his speech in April, in which he said that the enforcement steps in history have taken place only during a major crisis. Perhaps this is why during the Corona crisis, China has opened several fronts to create an edge. From Hong Kong and Taiwan to the South and the East China Sea and the Himalayan region, this is reflected in its stand on India.

These steps of Xi are helping divert attention from China's suspected role in the coronavirus. However, it also shows how their dictatorial rule can pose a threat to international security. 

US Secretary of State Mike Pompeo has said that China's aggression is increasing day by day. China is showing its eyes to the superpower of America, which has transformed China's economic transformation. 

]The US-China Cold War may be in the womb of the future, but the India-China Cold War has started. The military standoff arising from the encroachment of China on the Ladakh front may take the form of war.

By opening a war front with India, Xi seems to be setting up a big military struggle. While Mao Tse Tung dismantled China's old system and Deng Xiaoping laid the foundation for the modern Chinese economy, Xi seems committed to making China the world's largest force. This ambition should not make him so blind that he can invite international rebellion. 

It is perhaps too early to compare China under Xi's rule to Adolf Hitler's Nazi Germany, but on social media he is being called Hitler. In the torture centers, however, one can learn from the mistakes of Xi Hitler by overcoming the aggression of more than 1 million Muslims and aggression on their neighboring countries, which had opened up its power by opening many fronts. 

China may be a great force, but it has no true friend. It also lacks a trusted strategic partner. In fact, the more powerful China becomes, the more difficult it will be to create genuine partners. Can Xi make China the world's biggest power without partners? The notion behind Xi's adventurous approach is that it will not cost China anything.

So far, this strategy has proved to be effective, because other major powers of the world have been engaged in verbal hoarding instead of concrete action, but recently the equations have changed a bit. Xi has begun inviting international outrage by showing the malfeasance of completely capturing Hong Kong on the lines of the Corona epidemic and then Tibet. 

The Corona epidemic has shown how heavy the world of autocratic China can cost. This pandemic may undermine Xi's neo-imperialist ambitions. All the countries of the world are reducing their economic dependence on Beijing. Foreign companies are migrating from China. US President Donald Trump has also imposed strict restrictions on China. 

As far as the India-China border is concerned, there was no such line in history. India had a border with Tibet, but in 1951 China changed the situation by seizing Tibet. Since then, whenever China has shown aggression against India, some people in the country blamed India for this. 

He did not even notice that showing muscle power is part of China's communist culture. One, India started developing infrastructure along the China border lately and if some Indians see this exercise and the constitutional change in the status of Jammu and Kashmir last year as the reason for China's latest aggression, then they are actually in the hands of China Are playing Even when Manmohan Singh was Prime Minister in 2013, China had infiltrated the Depsang region of Ladakh. 

READ HERE MORE : USA Imposes Strict Ban On Syria

Now India should give the boundary line its right historical name 'Indo-Tibet border'. We should remember that when we went to China in 1967, its air of aggression arose and peace was ensured on the Himalayan border. 

Conversely, whenever India showed warm-heartedness, China in turn inflicted wounds. In 1967, we were still recovering from the wars of 62 and 65, yet on the Sikkim-Tibet border, we gave a befitting reply to China. Now the nuclear power is rich and for many years the largest importer of weapons in the world, is India of 2020 even weaker than that of 1967? 

Today, there is no weak coalition government in India. The current government has an overwhelming majority in Parliament. The Prime Minister has wide public support. Narendra Modi's image among his supporters is that of a leader who can never disappoint the country. 

His leadership is going to be tested on Ladakh's front. Indeed, India's international position and its security scenario will depend to a large extent on how it deals with the military standoff with China.