Canada has recently become known as a safe haven for terrorists, extremists, and organized crime. This is not a good look for the country, and it’s Canada that should be worried. Canadian security agencies are currently investigating serious allegations that link Indian government agents to the assassination of a Canadian citizen, Hardip Singh Nijjar. Prime Minister Trudeau’s provocative statements have severely damaged diplomatic relations between India and Canada, and attempts to backtrack have failed miserably.

The main issue here is Canada's role in inciting violence, ignoring extremist activities, and creating an environment that disrupts Indian diplomatic missions. This is why India has temporarily stopped issuing visas and providing visa services. India is using this situation strategically, similar to how it handled buying oil at discounted rates from Russia. By suspending a senior Canadian diplomat in response, India’s recent actions are equivalent to firing a diplomatic missile.

Officially, Canada cited operational difficulties for suspending services, but there’s more to the story. Until recently, relations between India and Canada, though strained by the Khalistan issue, were relatively stable. Both countries were even discussing a trade deal, now abruptly put on hold. Things seem to be getting worse before they get better.

This crisis is rooted in Trudeau's reluctance to act against Khalistani elements, who are frequently involved in gang wars on Canadian streets. Recently, Sughd Singh, a well-known Canadian Khalistani gangster, was shot dead. Trudeau’s political calculations involve maintaining his Khalistani vote bank, making him unlikely to act against them. This means the gap between India and Canada will continue to widen.

What could be India’s strategy? First, India will demand concrete evidence. This aims to expose Western hypocrisy. India has outrightly rejected Trudeau’s baseless allegations and will keep highlighting the lack of evidence. If Trudeau fails to provide substantial evidence, it will backfire on him. Meanwhile, India will point out the double standards of the West. Extrajudicial killings are wrong, but Western countries have a history full of such acts, often glamorized by Hollywood.

Consider how this terrorist’s life ended and Trudeau’s response. If we look into the history of targeted assassinations by Western nations, it’s extensive. These acts don’t stop being real just because they are later made into movies. Canada is trying to blame India without presenting any solid evidence while standing with countries that have a notorious track record of such actions.

Canada’s hypocritical stance is clear. Trudeau’s government has ignored the activities of Khalistani extremists, allowing them to operate freely in Canada. These extremists are responsible for inciting violence and disrupting peace in India. Trudeau’s pandering to this violent group for political gain is not only irresponsible but also dangerous.

The murder of Hardip Singh Nijjar is being used by Trudeau in a political game to malign India without proof. This reckless accusation, without evidence, is a desperate attempt to divert attention from the failures of Trudeau’s administration. By blaming India, Trudeau hopes to secure his Khalistani vote bank, but at what cost? Diplomatic relations between India and Canada are now on the brink of collapse.

India’s call for evidence isn’t just a defensive move; it’s a demand for accountability. If Canada can’t substantiate its allegations, it must face international scrutiny for its baseless claims. Trudeau needs to prove his accusations or deal with the consequences of his inflammatory rhetoric.

My opinion after reading or knowing all the facts is that Trudeau’s actions have set a dangerous precedent. By allowing extremists to flourish and making unfounded allegations against India, he has jeopardized diplomatic relations and regional stability. India’s firm stance and demand for evidence are about clearing its name and exposing the hypocrisy and double standards of Western nations, particularly Canada. The world is watching, and Trudeau’s next moves will determine whether Canada can salvage its tarnished reputation or sink further into diplomatic isolation.