Highlights

• Hе was a staunch bеliеvеr in non-violеncе, but hе also supportеd thе usе of violеncе in sеlf-dеfеnsе.
• Hе was opposеd to untouchability, but hе did not bеliеvе that womеn should havе thе samе rights as mеn.
• Hе was a strong critic of British rulе in India, but hе also supportеd thе British war еffort during World War II.
• Hе was assassinatеd by a Hindu nationalist who disagrееd with his viеws on communalism.

Let me start with the view. First, his name short form was MK gandhi. M stands for Mahatma and he don't deserved to be called as Mahatma. 

I might sound off , but so called bhakts of mahatma gandhi, you will get to know the reality of the person to whom you think that he sacrifice a lot to make india independence today but your thinking is wrong.

I might explain that despite the fact that Mahatma Gandhi is prominently known as "Father of the Nation," no such title was at any point officially gave on him by the public authority.

Father of the Nation is an honorific title given to a man who called as the driving face behind the foundation of the country .It was Subhash Chandra Bose who involved the term for Mahatma Gandhi, in a radio address from Singapore in 1944. Afterward, it was perceived by the Indian government. At the point when Gandhi was killed, India's most memorable state leader Jawaharlal Nehru, in a radio location to the country, had reported that the Dad of the Country "is no more."

Going to your inquiry 'Would he say he was truly answerable for India's opportunity? Can his positive energy measure up to that of like Jhansi Ki Rani and Bhagat Singh?'- Indeed, totally. Also, there is not even a shadow of a doubt. If it's not too much trouble, notice he alone was not answerable for it. Enthusiasm is an excellence and we have no decimal standard to quantify it. So we can't look at the positive energy of two people. The commitments of an unrecognized yet truly great individual like Alluri Sitarama Raju were just about as significant as of Mahatma Gandhi, Jhansi ki Rani and Bhagat Singh in the Indian opportunity battle.

You truly feel that the British left since Gandhi walked to spots or he could begin fasting, or could just calmly consent to a large portion of the orders from the British?

Individuals like Subhash Chandra Bose, Bhagat Singh, Chandrashekhar Azad, and so on sat idle. Do you really think?

It was the retaliation of such fake mahatma like mahatma gandhi that got the opportunity to do something for india. He was just a peace of shit!

Gandhi was a mannkind' in the possession of Congress (Nehru family), and he was celebrated by them.

His endeavors in his own life don't commend him either? Who lays down with exposed young ladies not exactly a portion of their age to test their determination? Also, they were his own nieces. Could you call such a man a dad?

The whole nation was partitioned and Gandhi didn't intervene. Many homes in Punjab were divided. Envision having one room in india and one in Pakistan. Envision the disorder? We Sindhis, lost our country. How did Gandhi respond?

He doesn't called himself as the father of the nation.

Gandhiji once presented the Quran  at a Valmiki Basti Sanctuary in Delhi. The lady got up from the group and asked Gandhi to avoid that. Gandhi asked, "Why?" The lady said it was "against our religion." Gandhi said, "I don't think so." The lady answered that we don't think of you as qualified to arrange our religion.

Gandhi said to take the vote of individuals present there. " Could religion at any not entirely settled by votes?" the lady inquired. Gandhi answered, "You are preventing my religion." The lady answered that he is illicitly meddling in the religion of crores of Hindus. Gandhi said, "I pay attention to the Quran." The lady said that she go against it.

Many Valmiki young people defended the lady and said, "Read the Quran in this sanctuary, however prior to presenting the Quran in the sanctuary recount the Gita or Ramayana in the mosque." Seeing the developing fights, Gandhi called the police who showed up and got the dissidents. 107 bodies of evidence were enlisted against them.

Gandhi then, at that point, recounted the Quran in a similar sanctuary under police security.

Most people don't like Gandhiji due to his hypocrite behavior.

Gandhi traveled to South Africa with the intention of earning money and gaining recognition because he didn't have success, as a lawyer in India. His main purpose was to assist Abdullah & Co. a smuggling business, for which he charged a fee.

After studying law and becoming a Barrister Gandhi lived a lifestyle exploring modes of transportation like trains, ships and cars during his time in the UK and South Africa. However around the age of 40 45 he returned to India in 1915. Authored Hind Swaraj , advocating for Indians to embrace village life while rejecting modernity, cities, trains, armies and industries. He was known as a man.

Upon returning to India and joining the freedom struggle Gandhi gained fame for his commitment to pacifism; however it's important to note that he didn't always advocate for peace. When the British Empire requested his assistance in recruiting soldiers during World War I based on his recruitment work in the Boer War Gandhi agreed hastily. He mistakenly believed that supporting Britain would lead them to grant India autonomy. As part of this support during World War I, in 1918 he even recruited Indians into the army.

"The empire that has been protecting India and which India hopes to be a partner, with is in danger during World War 1. It would not be appropriate for India to stay detached. India owes a lot to the Englishmen and, without them we wouldn't have made any progress. The English people, who value freedom will surely. Support us when they see that we are willing to sacrifice our lives for their cause."

Gandhi had relationships, with women aged between 18 to 25. This is not widely known. It is indeed true (for information you can refer to books by Dr. L. R. BALI titled "RANGEELA GANDHI" & "KYA GANDHI MAHATMA THE"). The women who were involved with Gandhi acknowledged this fact. Gandhi claimed that these relationships were part of his BRAHMCHARI Experiments. However the true intentions, behind these experiments remain unknown. Gandhi himself admitted that when he went to London for studies he made a decision to abstain from meat, alcohol and sexual activities. Yet he confessed that he struggled to control himself in matters of sexuality.

Regarding Udham Singh act of killing General Dyer  he expressed pain. Considered it an act of insanity. He hoped that this incident would not influence judgment. Subhas C Bose believed that Indians should draw inspiration from Udham Singh.

There is a claim that Gandhi concealed his efforts to save Bhagat Singh from execution. However the truth is that he never attempted to contact the Viceroy regarding Bhagat Singhs case. In his writings a friend of both the Viceroy and Bhagat Singh named MANMATH NATH mentions these facts. It is believed that Gandhi feared Bhagat Singhs growing popularity, which made him uneasy so he remained silent, on the matter. One popular theory suggests that Gandhi had the opportunity to prevent Bhagat Singhs' execution but chose not to intervene. 

There is a variation of this theory suggesting that Gandhi actively conspired with the British to ensure Singhs execution. When his parents tried to arrange his marriage in an India, Bhagat Singh left home for Kanpur. Famously declared that death alone would be his bride. Did Gandhi make sacrifices? Probably not, as he is showing fakeness to the world

During the Round Table Conferences Gandhi failed to provide complete information, to the people. He withheld details that were actually true.

Untill 1930 Gandhi never requested a complete Freedom. Gandhi was requesting home rule. A framework wherein the entire system will be in the hand of the british however the govenrment will be of Indians. The genuine interest behind home rule was to get the political blessing; not freedom. Veer Savarkar was the first person who raise his voice for total freedom "Poorna Swaraj". Later on Bhagat Singh and different progressives joined, which they felt is expected for the advancement of India. As a matter of fact in 1929 Srinivas Iyenger was removed from the Congress for requesting full freedom, not simply home rule. Gandhi was running the Congress as a dictator.

Gandhi had no clue about how a nation is run. He picked socialism over an unregulated economy, he was against militarization, and he was against huge dams. He was against all that is expected by a country to eliminate poverty, and hunger and to become powerful. He was profoundly engaged with his ridiculous and unfeasible way of thinking of peacefulness and ahimsa, never thinking often about the real world problems that is faced by a common people.

In short, gandhi is such a egoistic person whose sole purpose is everybody should bow down in front of him and agrees on his point.

How should person brought into the world in 1869 be called our father? Today our kids are coercively fed this thought that he drove the development of the India struggle for independence against british rule. Something which is just partially right. There were different pioneers who helped out this nation however they were overshadowed by the picture of Gandhi. Gandhi just like the girls and his sole purpose was to prove himself right wherever he was wrong.