Highlights

Historical Background- Akhand Bharat refers to the idea of an Indian subcontinent that included present day India, Pakistan, Bangladesh and neighboring regions before the partition, in 1947.

Cultural and Historical Ties- The region shares linguistic and historical connections, which make the concept of a unified Bharat appealing to many.

People to People Relationships- Despite divisions individuals from these regions often maintain relationships and friendships across borders fostering a sense of shared identity.

Economic Integration- A united subcontinent could create a bloc that has the potential to enhance trade, investments and regional development.

Global Influence- A united subcontinent could have an economic influence on the global stage.

Changing Geopolitics- Over time geopolitical dynamics can change, creating opportunities, for reconciliation and cooperation.

It begins with that current Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Nepal, Bhutan, India, Maldives, Mayanmar, Pakistan, and Sri Lanka, which once framed an incredible country.

Individuals of Hindu religion call solid India the brilliant age of the standard of Hindu lords. At the point when we pay attention to the discussion of joined India and turn the pages of history, then the discussion of joined India said by Hindu associations looks totally changed based on the pages of history.

You should imagine that whole India would be governed by just a single Hindu lord; yet, it's just a fantasy. There never at any point existed a unified India.

Indeed, one might say that Ashoka controlled a large portion of the domain of India as a lord during his rule. After this, every one of the lords, be it Maharana Pratap Singh or Chhatrapati Shivaji, yet no Hindu lord could manage a more area than Ashoka.

The historical backdrop of India shows that Hindu lords never lived as one with one another. Because of the non-concurrence of these lords, India was governed by the Britishers alongside the Mughals and India wore the chains of servitude for a really long time.

On the off chance that seen as a country, India was never a nation, yet has been a realm of various lords isolated into various segments. In such a circumstance, the people who discuss solid India, it is possible that they have not perused the historical backdrop of India or they are intellectually exceptionally feeble.

Before Freedom, England needed to hold their domain by chasing after a division of gap and rule, Hindu-Muslim solidarity couldn't be accomplished the length of the Britishers were there. After freedom, when Britishers don't manage us any longer, us would rather not live respectively.

Presently we should discuss the present, is it right or wrong to envision a unified India as of now?

Today, be it Pakistan or Afghanistan or Bangladesh or Myanmar, every one of the nations have laid out their personality in the entire world as discrete countries. In such a circumstance, I fail to see how you will persuade these nations and how you will let them know joined India. Have an independent perspective and see, is it right to envision a unified India as of now? I think it is a stupid dream to envision a unified India as of now.

Will India assault nations like Pakistan, Nepal, Bhutan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka, Myanmar for joined India? Can this large number of nations acknowledge the vision of Hindu associations for a unified India?

Allow us to expect that every one of the nations have acknowledged the idea of Hindu associations, joined India, however after that Hindus and Muslims will come similarly in the number of inhabitants in joined India. Will Hinduism not be in peril after that?

Since at present the anxiety toward 30 crore Muslims living in India is being imparted among the Hindus of India by Hindu associations. This moment there is a populace of around 100 crore Hindus in India. In the event that Akhand Bharatis framed, there won't be a lot of distinction among Hindu and Muslim population. To which nation will Hindu associations send Muslims after the development of a unified India?

In the event that Akhand Bharat is framed, how might it be pronounced as a Hindu country? In joined India, the number of inhabitants in Muslims will be such a lot of that it will speak more loudly against the Hindu country. Do Hindu associations need a Hindu country alongside a unified India? At the point when at present 30 crore Muslims are being ingrained with dread north of 100 crore Hindus, then after the arrangement of solid India, this dread will increment significantly more.

Hindu associations need to reexamine about the idea of joined India. If not, this speculation will stay restricted to theory as it were. In the present time, the Hindu associations of India shouldn't trifle with different nations as the Hindu associations of India take the Dalits and Muslims of India.

What's more, even lets expect that we get into a conflict with Pakistan strongly and later on we gain the entire of pakistan, and even Bangladesh for name, could we be in harmony and congruity? Also, we should assume regardless of whether it happens tomorrow, why do we cry and request some from the populace from West Bengal to move back to Bangladesh?

Actually we can't take care of ourselves today, imagine a scenario in which we have more populace. Where's work? Where's cash? Where's tranquility and agreement fella? What's more, how about we be consistent with ourselves. Isn't this Akhand Bharat dream is tied in with executing only one religion Hindu over each and every other religion? Simply tell the truth to yourself.

Since from my experience the individuals who are thundering today are just thundering Hindu versus Muslims.

Akhand bharat will be possible if we change our mindsets. Everything will be difficult from the beginning, but if you keep trying then all things turn around at be your success.

Keep in mind, Shri Ram took nothing from Lanka even subsequent to winning the fight, he said "Lanka" has a place with individuals of Lanka, I reserve no privileges to assume anything from that position" and he inquired "Vibhishan" to take the charge of Lanka.

We has a place with such a high worth culture - "Dharma".

We, don't force our way of life and don't attempt to obliterate their way of life. ( This mentality is our benefit and consequently even today Taliban and Afghans have more trust on us than some other individuals or nations on this planet).

We put stock in acknowledgment (of individuals with their way of life and religion) by turning out to be essential for the different culture/country.

In this way, assuming we proceed similar outlooks, things become nearly more straightforward for both the nations/societies.

If you have any desire to be one ("Akhand Bharat" isn't with the attitude of involving) with different neighbors, we need to prevail upon individuals of the specific country.

We have developed medical clinics, streets, dam, parliament building, Libraries and so on in Afghanistan and, this is the explanation we have a lot of acknowledgment among individuals of Afghanistan.

One day, we will reunite india and satisfaction with success got achieved